December one Joseph Benna was deported here from Shanghai and discharged on his going to Singapore.
7. Under paragraph 107 of the same Order in Council, there was power to deport the lady to England and, with his consent, the man to Singapore, in the first instance.
8. Is it not time to invite the attention of His Excellency Sir Ernest Satow to these cases and to protest against this Colony being made the destination of persons who are undesirable characters? Why should Hongkong and not England be selected as the place of deposit of such people? Why does not the Supreme Court of China and Corea always exercise its powers under paragraph 107 of the Order in Council and enquire whether parties consent to be deported elsewhere than to Hongkong or England?
9. There is no reason why this Colony should have to face the alternative of the expense of causing the deportee to be taken to England or of discharging such evil persons in her midst (c.f. paragraph 112).
10. If the Supreme Court of China and Corea has no funds for deportation purposes, the remedy is to obtain funds or to cease to deport to Hongkong persons who are not of Hongkong origin.
11. It may be pointed out that only a person who fails to give security for his future good behaviour may be deported (paragraph 106 of the Order in Council), and that a person convicted at Hankow and imprisoned at Shanghai is hardly likely to be in a position to give such security. In the majority of such cases therefore it is only necessary to make an order to give security to ensure deportation and the removal of bad characters from Treaty Ports and out of Consular Jurisdiction.
12. I have sought a reason for conferring the
82
99
«XOKMJEISBÝ
„AÍ CIELOB „AJŽÍ,anoxbaor
* 486 Lue B01J0 saj 10 SII daethened netnu
.72
(YTY 9583 809I siomondo Lar vicJoeniú 99%) 2941 TonuQD NI TeĒTU
eidolusu ® gekau Leutedil eved 1 Jødj J10qen od quonod saj sved i
20. EINE GIR to Loveel (i9c01cna 21 ygos dorda to) Ja8778k noid
Stopy 891ul São (1970) Lie enido no1 Jivo) shenqué 8*\Jes(B#
.eierbne2
J SVIJNA + af ed JunJ 2Ajrje nuž15g anjl
Ha Jeud „ASHI (suul „dJ6 no 11700 ze* ad sneda ,nosner lo svijen
01
J.
but beopdod eno novaded w@ruceqxs viret er ine 89kitob yuntad and
DOOMBEN OJ Nord og of GALLIDA 21 SÅ Jɛdj Los ankiot Leninud Caj
.Bensaxe no eld Ja
.8
ni Lenee Jon eɛ# en Jend lejrje 0818 en
purenuo luvda en Jon to gedus.f* (Lanoeingrt zen 91 eseda) [rdgnedē
bakišne to anONGDON DRAJ 19ĖJO Soria ene od tejmoqat ad oj
9000 Sara 910 to ful dasturtea akiv) .9okių svijen kid
-UNIV
NOOGARA
(ircquod al
.*
XER YOU$1199x* ein 301 dgstreneą naknų
-jojaus wont aid egnedceit no Loriund CJ 088 9dd Joust 19dJIE
JOIJOB (NK 81019d saqk19 of Lexolis 90 Júsiajmol s jadj jestsue i
90J 9V/5047 oj skij svað ¿âu 98j10qət edj jødu metno ni ‚DSKPJ EI
.noosaøn OJ NAUJOT OJ Nid sidene of #jofqxe så snor
Jara el nidjis ecorjeni iɔad 983 21 eidī
si yo eno100 end of Lejmoqet need univei eaoɛnsą to adjao *18
.89100 Las saldo to snuoƆ arengua
.visi B
8001 „Jauqua to Las sid stenol
A
„AJAI 9A3 no bae yowa moni ezed Lejncust 200 Larians to evijan B
190#9000
谭
SIGEL
.178J67252 ikin010J IJO
December one Joseph Benna was deported here from Shanghai and dis-
charged on his going to Singapore.
7.
Under paragraph 107 of the same Order in
Council, there was power to deport the lady to England and, with
his consent, the man to Singapore, in the first instance.
8.
is it not time to invite.the attention of bis
Excellency Sir Ernest Satow to these cases and to protest against
this Colony being made the destination of persons who are un-
desirable characters ?
Why should Hongxong and not England be select-
ed as the place of deposit of such people ?
Why does not the Supreme Court of China and
Corea always exercise its powers under paragraph 107 of the Order
in Council and enquire whether parties consent to be deported
elsewhere than to Hongkong or England ?
9.
There is no reason why this Colony should
have to face the alternative of the expense of causing the depor-
tee to be taken to England or of discharging such evil persons in
her midst (c.f. paragraph 112.)
10.
If the Supreme Court of China and Corea has
no funds for deportation purposes, the remedy is to obtain funds or to cease to deport to Hongkong persons who are not of hong kong
origin.
11.
It may be pointed out that only a persons
who fails to give security for his future good behaviour may be deported (paragraph 106 of the Order in Council), and that a person convicted at Hankow and imprisoned at Shanghai is hardly likely to be in a position to give such security. In the majority of such cases therefore it is only necessary to make an order to give security to ensure deportation and the removal of bad charac- ters from Treaty Forts and out of Consular Jurisdiction.
12.
i have sought a reason for conferring the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.